Wednesday, May 25, 2011

We Need to Talk About Melancholia

As promised, now that the Cannes film festival has closed up, now that all the surprises, awards and upsets are out on the table, I have a couple of films that I'm excited about. The first one is the dreamy, end of the world, romantic fantasy, Melancholia by Danish filmmaker, Lars von Trier. In the immediate aftermath of its screening at Cannes it was receiving excellent reviews, it was called a masterpiece, it was just about the buzziest of all the buzz-filled films, heck, it was being called a masterpiece AND accessible (ie - enjoyable beyond just the tiny strata of intellectual film buffs.) The film follows Justine (Kirsten Dunst) at her lavish wedding reception held at her sister Claire's (Charlotte Gainsbourg) house. Justine's melancholic nature haunts her even through her fairytale of a wedding while her sister Claire's naturally sensible disposition allows her to thrive in all social situations. Justine's mental state further deteriorates and Claire becomes her caretaker. In the second half of the film, a planet on a collision course with the earth is about to bring an end to life on earth. The tables turn and Justine's melancholia allows her to thrive in the face of The End while her sister struggles to say goodbye to a world she loves dearly. The plot is romanic and apocalyptic, and the soundtrack is full of Wagner's Tristan und Isolde. Drama, beauty and the romantic ideal of the sublime are exquisitely rendered, and Dunst's dreamy performance won her the best actress award. However, von Trier, the filmmaker most recently known for the shockingly brutal film Antichrist, and previously knownfor the Björk fest, Dancer in the Dark, seemed unable to do the smile and wave, thanks for all the the praise, modest head bob, and perhaps a little eccentric show of artsiness routine that's expected of makers of masterpieces, accessible or not. His tattoo (nsfw) was plenty balls out eccentric and he could have gone with that as his memorable moment but he didn't.

Instead von Trier took the path of most resistance and bombed his press conference with increasingly line-nudging jokes about casting his female leads, Gainsbourg & Dunst in a pornographic film next, understanding Hitler, and a reflection on his German family tree as making him "a nazi." Cannes quickly responded by naming him a "persona non grata" and banning him from the festival. Von Trier later attempted to run damage control and explain that no, he is not a nazi, that his words were the result of a struggle to express himself properly in english (not his native language,) and that they were "stupid." Stupid displays
of antisemitism have not been as uncommon as one might expect (just ask another Cannes guest, Mel Gibson) but nazi jokes, other than the ubiquitous "Hitler hears about X" clips, are pretty much universally in bad taste. As far as I can tell, it seems unlikely that von Trier, who grew up with a jewish father, is actually an honest to goodness anti-semite, however, whatever self destructive impulse that drove him to make those comments is probably best left at home next time.


The other film I am excited about is Lynne Ramsay's We Need to Talk About Kevin, based on the book of the same name by Lionel Shriver. Tilda Swinton stars as Eva, the somewhat ambivalent mother of Kevin, a teenaged boy who has just committed a violent crime. Swinton has an impressive presence on film. A friend first pointed her out to me over a decade ago in the film The War Zone. Watch her face, he said, it's fascinating. It was. She has since starred in several films, taken home an Oscar and cornered the market on tall, jumpy, gaunt women. In this film the strained
relationship between Swinton's Eva and her son Kevin is on display and Eva worries that it was a catalyst for his actions. Eva is a parent who is, it seems, trying to do her best but ends up feeling responsible for creating a monster out of her son.

Watch a clip from the film Here and Here

Monday, May 16, 2011

Fun far from Cannes

The Festival de Cannes is currently in full swing over on the lovely coast of France. Some of the best and the brightest filmmakers, actors, directors, producers and film buffs are gathered to watch the likes of Tilda Swinton in Lynne Ramsay's We Need to Talk About Kevin, and Kirsten Dunst in Lars von Trier's Melancholia. Both films sound excellent and I hope to be able to say more about them soon. For the moment though I'd like to offer the light, refreshing palate cleanser of a comedy, The Best and the Brightest about the difficulty of finding a slot at a good kindergarten in Manhattan.

Finding a good kindergarten; public, private, magnet, language immersion, charter, homeschooling program, etc. is difficult just about everywhere (and as the parent of a first grader, I know how hard it can be) but it's a special kind of impossible up in Manhattan.
The movie starts with parents Jeff and Samantha (Neil Patrick Harris and Bonnie Somerville) moving to Manhattan with their five year old daughter only to discover there are no available options anywhere. They are forced to take matters into their own hands, or at least to hire the competent hands of Sue Lemon (Amy Sedaris.)

In order to stand out above the crowd of deep pocketed parents desperate to get their child the coveted last spot at a good private school, they fudge the truth and make Jeff out to be an accomplished poet. But the question arrises; how will he produce the poetry? Due to a series of accidents, the source for poetic content is mined from the raunchy
texts between an old college friend and a series of lovers. The earnest reading of these texts, especially as read by pokerfaced John Hodgman, steal the show.
The fact that the poet has no clothes, both in the sense of the fable and in the sense of the innuendo, becomes a hilarious punchline. No, it wouldn't go to Cannes, but it was an enjoyable farce. I laughed and laughed, then I cringed a bit, then I laughed
some more, then I hid under a blanket cringing a couple more times, then I laughed and laughed even more.

Fun Philly side note: the film is set in Manhattan but filmed, rather obviously to
anyone familiar with either city, in Philadelphia. I'm assuming they couldn't both set and film it in Philly because, unlike Manhattan, parents are generally able to hold off until their kids are eating solid food and making a stab at language before having to pick a school. Watch for iconic shots of the Union League and the Rittenhouse Square frog statue!


Tuesday, May 10, 2011

"I Am", Am I?


Tom Shadyac's unusual documentary has been creeping up on me from several sources. Part star-studded make-the-world-a-better-place film, part sincere-personal-journey-toward-enlightment, it has been slowly gaining an audience.

Shadyac was the director of a popular string of feel-good comedies that included Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, Patch Adams, and Bruce Almighty before he was seriously injured in a bicycle accident and found himself faced with some big life and death questions. Being a funny, smart, and well connected filmmaker, he decided to turn those questions into a movie, a movie with a purpose; to help fix what's wrong with the world. The film features interviews with everyone from Noam Chomsky to David Suzuki to Desmond Tutu.

Can a film make the world a better place? Can a film about making the world a better place be a good film, an interesting film, an exciting film? Critics and viewers seem passionately split on the issue; what's your take?